FS Register FRN 1029698

55 Five Star Google Reviews

13+ years specialist broking experience

General information, not advice. Written for general guidance and drawing on external sources as well as our own experience. It isn't a personal recommendation and doesn't take account of your circumstances — full disclaimer and sources.

Professional Indemnity Run-Off Cover UK

PI Run-Off Cover UK: Closing, Retiring or Dissolved Firms

May 31, 2026

Published: 31 May 2026 📖 22 min read 🗂️ Professional Indemnity ✍️ By John Miller, Director & Principal Broker
Last reviewed by John Miller — 4 October 2026
1029698FS Register FRN
13+ yrsSpecialist broking
Lloyd'sMarket access
UK-basedSwansea office

Why does run-off cover matter when you stop trading?

Here is the uncomfortable truth most professionals only discover too late: your liability doesn't end when your business does. If you provide advice, design or professional services and you close your firm, retire, sell up, or simply move to employment, you can still be sued years later for work you completed while trading. And because professional indemnity insurance works on a "claims-made" basis, the policy you held when you did the work won't help — only a live policy at the moment the claim is made responds. Cancel your PI the day you close, and a claim that lands eighteen months later finds you with no cover at all.

Run-off cover is the solution to that gap, and getting it right is exactly the kind of fiddly, easily-botched placement where a specialist broker earns their fee rather than a price-comparison site. At Miller & Partner we place professional indemnity and run-off cover for professionals winding down, and treat these complex, easily-mishandled risks with the care they need. This guide explains how claims-made cover works, what run-off does, how long you need it, and the retroactive-date traps that catch people out when they switch or stop.

Key facts: professional indemnity run-off cover

  • PI is "claims-made" — a live policy must be in force when the claim is made, regardless of when you did the work. Cancel on closure and later claims are uninsured.
  • Run-off cover protects past work after you stop — closing, retiring, selling or moving to employment. It's typically available for around 1–6 years.
  • Six years is the common benchmark — it aligns with the standard limitation period for negligence claims under the Limitation Act 1980 (though latent-damage rules can extend this).
  • Some regulators mandate run-off — the SRA and RICS require six years for firms that close, ARB expects architects to keep at least six years (five in Scotland), and ICAEW requires accountancy firms to arrange appropriate run-off.
  • Letting a policy lapse can forfeit your retroactive date — break cover and restart, and you may lose protection for all your historic work.
  • You can be pursued personally — without run-off, former directors, partners or sole traders can face claims in a personal capacity (see Merrett v Babb).

How does The Insurability Framework™ help with run-off?

Run-off and retroactive-date continuity are exactly the complex, easily-mishandled placements where generalist routes fail. Getting them right is what the Insurability Framework was built for, through four pillars.

PILLAR 01

Underwriter Intelligence

We know how insurers price and structure run-off — the limit, the period, the retroactive date — and how to present a winding-down practice so the cover you need is available on sensible terms rather than overlooked.

PILLAR 02

Difficult Risk Expertise

Specialist placement for situations standard online routes handle badly — closure, retirement, a business sale, an insurer exiting your sector — including arranging run-off where your existing insurer won't continue.

PILLAR 03

Risk Assessment

We identify the hidden exposures — the forfeited retroactive date, the gap when switching, the contractual or regulatory run-off period you must maintain, the personal-liability risk — before they become an uninsured claim.

PILLAR 04

Claims Advocacy

Real support from real people if a claim lands years after you stopped trading — long-tail, stressful and often personal — not a call centre. We argue your corner when it matters most.

Closing, retiring or selling? Arrange run-off before you cancel your PI, and protect your retroactive date.

Why does "claims-made" change everything?

Almost all UK professional indemnity insurance is written on a claims-made basis, and understanding that one phrase is the key to everything else in this guide. A claims-made policy responds to claims that are first made against you and notified during the policy period — not claims relating to when the work was done. Compare that with most other business insurance ("claims-occurring"), where the policy in force when the incident happened responds, even years later.

The consequence is profound: with claims-made cover, the policy that protects you is always the one live at the moment the claim arrives. So if you finish a project in 2025, cancel your PI when you close in 2026, and a negligence claim lands in 2028, you have no cover — even though you were fully insured when you actually did the work. PI claims are "long-tail" liabilities: they routinely surface months or years after the work, and a meaningful proportion arrive more than three years later. That long tail is precisely why run-off cover exists.

The trap

"I was insured the whole time I was trading" feels like it should be enough. Under claims-made cover, it isn't. The only policy that pays a claim is the one live when the claim is made — so the day you cancel without run-off is the day your past work becomes uninsured.

🛡️ From recent placement conversations

"The conversations that stay with me are the ones with people who did everything right for thirty years, retired, cancelled their PI to save money — and then got a solicitor's letter about a job from 2022. They assumed being insured at the time was enough. With claims-made cover it never is. Arranging run-off before you close, and protecting the retroactive date, is the single most important thing a professional can do on the way out."

What exactly is run-off cover?

Run-off cover (sometimes called an extended reporting provision) is professional indemnity insurance that keeps responding to claims after your business has stopped trading — whether through closure, retirement, merger, sale or insolvency. It covers claims arising from work you completed before you ceased, but which are made and notified after. It does not cover any new work (there isn't any), which is one reason run-off is often priced more keenly than a full trading policy as the years pass and the tail of exposure shrinks.

Mechanically, you usually arrange it by telling your existing insurer you've ceased trading; they endorse the policy so no new work is covered, then at renewal offer run-off terms, typically renewed year by year for the period you need. Where your existing insurer won't continue — they've exited your sector, or won't offer the term you need — a specialist broker can place run-off in the wider market. We walk through how it's priced in the pricing section below.

Run-off vs cancelling: what's the difference?

The difference between arranging run-off and simply cancelling looks like a small admin decision at the time. It is, in fact, the difference between a protected retirement and an open-ended personal liability.

ScenarioJust cancel the policyArrange run-off cover
Claim on past work after closingUninsuredCovered
Defence costs for a later claimPaid personallyFunded by policy
Regulatory run-off requirementLikely breachedMet
Contractual "maintain insurance" clauseBreachedHonoured
Personal exposure of directors/partnersReal (Merrett v Babb)Protected
Peace of mind in retirementNoneYes

Who needs run-off cover, and for how long?

In principle, anyone who has provided professional advice or services and is winding down should consider run-off — consultants, IT contractors, designers, surveyors, accountants, architects, engineers, financial advisers and many more. The period you need depends on three things: your professional body's rules, your contracts, and the realistic tail of your work.

The six-year benchmark

Six years is the common default because it aligns with the standard limitation period for negligence under the Limitation Act 1980. Many professionals treat it as the minimum.

Common standard

Regulated professions

The SRA and RICS require a minimum of six years' run-off for firms that close. ARB expects architects to keep at least six years (five in Scotland), and ICAEW requires accountancy firms to arrange run-off. Check your body's rules.

Mandatory

Contractual obligations

Client contracts and appointments often require you to maintain PI for 6 or even 12 years from completion — a duty that survives the closure of your business.

Check contracts

Latent / long-tail work

Where defects can surface long after completion (construction, design), the Limitation Act's latent-damage rules can extend exposure beyond six years. The Building Safety Act 2022 also extended Defective Premises Act claims to 15 years for new work, and up to 30 years for work completed before 28 June 2022, so longer run-off may be prudent.

Consider longer
Broker note

This guide is general information, not legal or regulatory advice. Limitation periods and professional-body run-off rules are complex and fact-specific. Confirm your obligations with your regulator, your contracts and a qualified adviser — then let us arrange run-off built around them.

What is a retroactive date and why does it matter?

The retroactive date is the line in the past beyond which your policy won't look. Your PI covers claims arising from work done on or after this date — anything earlier is excluded, even with a live policy. If you've held continuous, unbroken PI since you started, your retroactive date normally reaches all the way back to when you began, and you're covered for everything. The danger is breaks in cover.

Here's the trap that catches people out: if you let your policy lapse and later restart, your retroactive date can reset to the new start date — wiping out cover for all your historic work. The same risk appears when you switch insurers: unless the new policy carries over your existing retroactive date (ideally "unlimited" retroactivity), you can lose protection for years of past work without realising it until a claim is declined. Reduced activity or "pausing" cover does not preserve your retroactive date unless formally agreed.

How do you avoid a gap when switching insurers?

Switching PI insurer to get a better premium is fine — but it's one of the highest-risk moments for an accidental coverage gap, and it must be handled deliberately. The rules are simple but unforgiving: never let the old policy lapse before the new one starts; make sure the new policy's retroactive date matches or precedes the old one; and get the continuity of that retroactive date confirmed in writing. Assumptions made at switching time often only surface years later, when a claim is submitted and the gap is discovered. This is precisely the kind of detail a specialist broker checks as a matter of routine — and a comparison site simply won't.

Can you be sued personally after closing?

Yes — and this is the consequence that makes run-off so important. If your business has closed and has no run-off cover, a claimant can in some circumstances pursue the individual professional personally. The well-known case of Merrett v Babb established that a professional can be held personally liable for negligent work even where the firm they worked for no longer provides a route to recovery. For a former sole trader, partner or director, that can mean defending a claim — and potentially paying damages — out of personal assets, years into retirement. Run-off cover is what stands between your past work and your personal savings.


🛡️ Run-Off Checker: do you need it?

Answer three quick questions for an instant, indicative read. Guidance only — not a quote or advice.

✅ Continuity checklist: is your cover protected?

Tick what applies. A self-check prompt, not advice — confirm specifics with your broker.

I understand my PI is "claims-made" — a live policy is needed when a claim is made.
I know my policy's retroactive date and that it covers my earliest relevant work.
I have never let my PI lapse (or I know exactly when any gap occurred).
When I last switched insurer, I confirmed the retroactive date carried over in writing.
I've checked my professional body's run-off requirements (if applicable).
I've checked whether any client contracts require me to maintain insurance after completion.

📊 Risk Assessor: how exposed is your legacy work?

A rough exposure indicator based on your past work. Indicative only.

How is run-off cover priced in 2026?

There's no flat rate for run-off cover — pricing reflects the risk you're leaving behind, not new work. Insurers look at the nature and value of the work you did, your claims history, the run-off period you need, and how far back your retroactive date reaches. A common pattern is that run-off is often charged as a percentage of your last full trading premium, sometimes falling year by year as the tail of exposure shrinks; some insurers offer multi-year deals. Because every winding-down situation is different, the right structure matters as much as the price — which is where specialist placement helps. The main factors:

Nature of past work

Advisory, design, safety-critical — higher-severity disciplines carry more tail risk and cost more to run off.

Run-off period

The number of years you need cover for — often six, but longer for latent-damage-prone work.

Claims history

A clean record keeps run-off affordable; prior claims raise the cost of the tail.

Limit of indemnity

The cover limit you carry into run-off, often driven by past contracts and regulatory minimums.

Retroactive date

How far back the cover reaches — full/unlimited retroactivity protects all historic work.

Market & structure

Whether your existing insurer continues, or a specialist broker places run-off elsewhere on better terms.

To show how the variables stack up rather than quote a figure, here are illustrative profiles. These are indicative explanations of the drivers — not quotes.

ProfileTypical characteristicsRun-off cost pressure
LowerLower-value advisory work, clean history, shorter tailMost affordable
ModerateMid-value projects, six-year requirement, clean-ish historyMid-range
HigherHigh-value or safety-critical work, long tail, prior claimsMost expensive / needs specialist placement
Where a broker saves you money

The costliest mistake we see isn't an expensive run-off policy — it's no run-off at all, leaving a retired professional personally exposed to a claim that wipes out their savings. The second is letting cover lapse and forfeiting the retroactive date. Arranging the right run-off term, protecting the retroactive date, and placing it in the right market is what turns an open-ended liability into a closed, affordable, time-limited one.

What do real run-off claims look like?

These illustrative scenarios show how the gaps in this guide play out. They are composite examples for explanation, not specific clients.

The cancelled-too-soon retirement

A consultant retired and cancelled their PI immediately to save the premium. Eighteen months later, a former client alleged negligent advice on a project completed before retirement and issued a claim.

The lesson: with no run-off, the claims-made policy that once covered the work was long gone. The consultant faced the defence costs and the claim personally. A run-off policy would have responded.

The forfeited retroactive date

A contractor let their PI lapse for a few months between contracts, then took out a fresh policy. The new policy's retroactive date reset to the new start date — and a claim then arrived relating to work done before the gap.

The lesson: the new policy didn't cover the earlier work because the retroactive date had reset. Maintaining unbroken cover, or carrying the retroactive date across, would have preserved protection.

The business sale that left a gap

A firm was sold; the seller assumed the buyer's insurance would cover legacy work. The buyer's policy carried a retroactive date from the acquisition, excluding the seller's pre-sale work — and a claim on that earlier work surfaced.

The lesson: on a sale, legacy liabilities don't transfer automatically. The seller needed their own run-off (or a clearly-agreed, evidenced arrangement) to cover pre-sale work.

How should you manage a claim in run-off?

A claim arriving after you've stopped trading is stressful precisely because the business is gone — but the right steps still protect you. These are what we guide clients through.

Don't ignore it — notify immediately

The moment you receive a claim, complaint or even a hint of one, notify your run-off insurer. Claims-made cover depends on prompt notification within the policy period.

Check your run-off is live

Confirm the run-off policy covering the relevant period is in force and that the retroactive date reaches the work in question.

Don't admit liability

Be factual and cooperative, but make no admissions before your insurer and any appointed lawyers are engaged.

Gather your records

Even years on, your files, contracts, correspondence and appointment terms are central to defending a claim — preserve whatever you retained.

Engage your broker early

We help you notify correctly, confirm the cover responds, and manage the insurer relationship through what can be a long process.

Let us advocate for you

A claim in retirement is daunting. We argue your corner, coordinate the defence and keep you informed — so you don't face it alone.


Glossary of key terms

Claims-made basis
The way PI works: cover responds to claims first made and notified during the policy period, regardless of when the work was done. A live policy is required when the claim arrives.
Run-off cover
PI that continues to respond to claims after a business has ceased trading, covering past work but no new activity. Sometimes called an extended reporting provision.
Retroactive date
The earliest date from which a policy will cover past work. Claims arising from work before this date are excluded, even with a live policy.
Unlimited retroactivity
A retroactive date with no cut-off, covering all past work however long ago — the strongest position for continuity.
Long-tail liability
A liability where claims can surface long after the work — common in professional services, and the core reason run-off exists.
Limitation Act 1980
The statute setting time limits for bringing claims. The general period for negligence is six years, though latent-damage rules (ss.14A, 32) can extend this.
Inception date
The start date of a particular policy — not to be confused with the retroactive date, which can reach further back.
Cessation of practice
The point at which a business stops trading — closure, retirement, merger, sale or insolvency — triggering the need for run-off.
SRA minimum terms
The Solicitors Regulation Authority's PI rules, which require a minimum of six years' run-off cover for solicitors' firms that close.
Supplementary run-off
Cover beyond the standard run-off period (e.g. beyond six years for solicitors), addressing claims that can still arise under latent-damage provisions.
Merrett v Babb
A leading case establishing that an individual professional can be held personally liable for negligent work, underlining why run-off matters after a business closes.

PI run-off cover FAQs

What is professional indemnity run-off cover?

It's PI insurance that keeps responding to claims after your business has stopped trading — through closure, retirement, sale or insolvency. It covers claims arising from work you completed before you ceased, but which are made afterwards. It doesn't cover new work.

Do I really need run-off if I was insured the whole time I traded?

Yes — because PI is claims-made. The only policy that pays a claim is the one live when the claim is made, not the one you held when you did the work. If you cancel on closure, a claim arriving later finds you with no cover, so run-off is what bridges that gap.

How long should run-off cover last?

Six years is the common benchmark, aligning with the standard limitation period for negligence under the Limitation Act 1980. Some regulators set a minimum: six years for solicitors (SRA) and surveyors (RICS), and at least six years for architects (ARB, five in Scotland). ICAEW requires accountancy firms to arrange appropriate run-off. For latent-damage-prone work, longer can be prudent.

Can I be sued personally after my business closes?

In some circumstances, yes. The case of Merrett v Babb established that an individual professional can be held personally liable for negligent work. Without run-off, a former sole trader, partner or director may have to defend a claim and pay damages from personal assets.

What happens to my retroactive date if I switch insurers?

It should carry over — but only if you arrange it. The new policy's retroactive date must match or precede the old one, and you should confirm it in writing. If it doesn't carry over, you can lose cover for years of past work without realising until a claim is declined.

What if I let my PI policy lapse?

A break in cover is risky. If you let the policy lapse and later restart, the retroactive date can reset to the new start date, forfeiting cover for all your earlier work. Reduced activity or "pausing" cover doesn't preserve the retroactive date unless formally agreed.

Is run-off cover sorted automatically when I sell my business?

Not automatically. Legacy liabilities don't transfer just because the business is sold. Either the buyer's policy must clearly cover your pre-sale work (with an appropriate retroactive date), or you need your own run-off. This should be agreed and evidenced as part of the sale.

How can a specialist broker help with run-off?

We approach every placement through The Insurability Framework — confirming the run-off period you need, protecting your retroactive date, and placing the cover in the right market, including where your existing insurer won't continue. The fastest start is to request a quote and tell us your plans.


Related guides

Need run-off cover, or a retroactive date checked? Tell us what's changing and we'll arrange cover that keeps your past work protected.

Important: This guide is general information about professional indemnity run-off cover for UK businesses, not financial, legal or regulatory advice. Policy wordings, retroactive dates, limitation periods and professional-body run-off requirements vary by profession and circumstance. Confirm your regulatory and contractual obligations with your professional body and a qualified adviser, and speak to a broker about cover suited to your situation. Miller & Partner Limited is an Appointed Representative of Gauntlet Risk Management Ltd, which is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority.
Back to Blog
About this article General information, not advice. Published for general guidance and drawing on external sources as well as our own experience. It is not a personal recommendation, a quotation, or an offer of cover, and it doesn't take account of your circumstances. Read more + Close −

Where the information comes from

Our articles are compiled from a range of sources: regulators and public bodies such as the FCA, the Civil Aviation Authority, the Health and Safety Executive and Companies House; government publications and legislation; industry and trade bodies; insurer and market documentation; and published research and news reporting. Not everything stated originates from Miller & Partner. Where information comes from a third party we believe it to be accurate at the date of publication, but we haven't independently verified every external source and we don't warrant its accuracy or completeness. Where a point matters to a decision you're making, go to the original source and check it.

Figures, examples and case studies

Premium ranges, cost figures, limits and worked examples are illustrative only. They are not quotations, not offers of cover, and no cover is provided or implied on the basis of them. What you're actually charged depends on underwriting, and what you're actually covered for depends on the policy wording issued to you. Where an article includes a claim example, scenario or case study, it is illustrative unless we say otherwise — such examples are typically composites written to show how a policy section responds, and they don't describe an identifiable client, claim or settlement.

Interactive tools

Any calculators, cover checkers, risk assessors or similar tools on our site produce general guidance from the small number of answers you give them. They can't see your business, and their output is not a personal recommendation, an assessment of your actual risk, or a quotation.

Rules and market conditions change

Law, regulation, tax treatment, insurer appetite and policy wordings all change, sometimes at short notice. Content is accurate to the best of our knowledge on the date shown on the article and we don't undertake to update it as things move. An article you're reading some time after publication may be out of date.

Third parties and external links

References to insurers, underwriters, trade bodies, software, training providers or other organisations are for information only. They don't imply endorsement, recommendation, partnership or affiliation in either direction unless stated. We're not responsible for the content of external websites we link to.

Not legal, tax or accounting advice

Nothing here is legal, tax, accounting or regulatory advice. Where an article discusses statutory duties, contract terms or compliance obligations, take advice from an appropriately qualified professional on your own position before acting.

How we write these

We use AI tools in researching and drafting our published content. Every article is reviewed and signed off by a named, accountable person at Miller & Partner before it is published, and responsibility for what appears here rests with us.

Our regulatory status

Miller & Partner Ltd is an Appointed Representative of Gauntlet Risk Management Ltd, which is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority (FRN 308081). Miller & Partner Ltd is entered on the FCA Register under reference 1029698. Registered in England and Wales, company number 16206282. Registered office: Vivian House, Roman Bridge Close, Mumbles, Swansea, SA3 5BG.

Spotted something wrong?

We'd rather know. Email [email protected] or call 01792 001350 and we'll review and correct it.

For advice on your own insurance arrangements, speak to us directly — that's when we can take your circumstances into account and give you a recommendation.

Ready to protect your business?
Get expert advice and a tailored commercial insurance quote today.

✔ Independent broker
✔ Access to leading UK insurers
✔ Fast turnaround

[Request a quote]

[[email protected]]
[Call 01792 001350]

Exclusive Offer

Free Insurance Review
& Zero Broker Fee

Let us review your current insurance and see if we can improve your cover while reducing the cost.

✓
Free no-obligation insurance review tailored to your business
£
Zero broker fee on all new policies
⚡
Fast response from a real insurance specialist

You're in 🎉

Thanks for requesting your free review. We'll be in touch shortly.

🔒 No spam, ever. Your details are safe with us.

We're an Appointed Representative of Gauntlet Risk Management Ltd, which is authorised and regulated by the FCA. You can check our entry on the FCA Register.

MEET THE Director

Hey, I'm John!

I started Miller & Partner with the aim to bring back personable, approachable broking to UK businesses who were tired of large corporate brokers and feeling like they were just another number.

I have built this brokerage up with no pushy sales techniques or big business tactics, just honest, approachable and professional relationships with my clients.

Over 13 years experience in business insurance

Client first approach

5* rated broker on Google

Office: Vivian House, Roman Bridge Close, Mumbles, Swansea, SA3 5BG

Miller & Partner Ltd is an Appointed Representative of Gauntlet Risk Management Ltd, which is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority (FRN 308081). Miller & Partner Ltd is entered on the Financial Services Register under firm reference number 1029698. You may check this on the Financial Services Register by visiting the FCA website at https://www.fca.org.uk/firms/financial-services-register or by contacting the FCA on 0800 111 6768. Miller & Partner Ltd is registered in England & Wales, company number 16206282. Registered office: 20 Vivian House, Roman Bridge Close, Swansea, SA3 5BG.